Roko’s basilisk has entered the chat

It seems like we’re going back to the 90s.

When Microsoft wanted to destroy Linux, Another similar arc is coming. I wonder if there will be other Halloween docs.

If patents did not exist, many people would be surprised that their medical expenses would be cheaper.

As several have already explained their questions, I will clarify some points.

Not all countries consider AI training using copyrighted material as theft. For example, Japan has allowed AI to be trained with copyrighted material since 2019, and it’s strange because that country is known for its strict laws in that regard.

Also, saying that AI can’t or won’t harm society sells. Although I don’t deny the consequences of this technology. But it will only be effective if AI doesn’t get better, because then it could be counterproductive.

OpenAI reminds me in some ways of Netscape, except that it hasn’t gone public yet, compared to the latter, which did so only 16 months after its founding.

They’re giving OpenAI more leverage to have a strong IPO in the future.

They used ChatGPT 4o, instead of using o1 or o3.

Obviously it was going to fail.

Most of the time technology does not cause a radical change in society except in some cases.

The system eventually adapts to new technology only if that technology can be replicated by anyone, and other problems suddenly appear that the system can’t solve at the same time. It’s just another dark age for humanity, and then it recovers and moves on.

Why doesn’t Mozilla change or add the MIT license to Pocket?

Each winter marks the beginning and end of a generation of AI. We are now seeing more progress and as long as there is no technical limit it seems that its progress will not be interrupted.