I’m on Debian 12. I did an upgrade today and got a message that pipewire-audio had been kept back. A few weeks ago I did a:

sudo apt install -t bookworm-backports pipewire

Which pulled in the newer version of pipewire so I could resolve an issue.

So I searched for ‘apt kept back’ and found the above article. I wanted to share it for anyone else in the future hitting something like this.

My solution is just to do nothing. Debian 13 should only be a few months away at this point and when I attempt to run an update only for pipewire-audio it indicates that I need to update wireplumber. I don’t really want to go down the dependency hole at this time, so just going to let it chill.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yeah the whole reason for packages being kept back is because they are rolling them out slowly to ensure that no major bugs affect the great majority of users of those packages.

    You wouldn’t want your whole Ubuntu or Debian user base getting stuck with the same problem and having to roll back all at the same time. availa roll out certain packages slowly so only a small portion have to do it, and also save your reputation, and finally give the package maintainers to fix the problem.

    • ozoned@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Thanks! I was wondering why that was. I looked at pipewire and it had been updated. That’s smart. Very happy to be on a stable base of Debian.

    • who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Yeah the whole reason for packages being kept back is because they are rolling them out slowly

      That’s an Ubuntu extension to APT. I don’t think Debian adopted it, and even if they had, this particular “kept back” message probably comes from a different mechanism.

      EDIT: OP is trying to install a backport of a package with a version-specific dependency; I’ll address that situation in a top-level comment.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I dunno. Sounds like a repo-specific thing. OP is on Debian 12 and what I’m understanding is they’re also seeing this message for a third party repo.