QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 个月前a bit of advicesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down15
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1imagea bit of advicesh.itjust.worksQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 个月前message-square37linkfedilink
minus-squareSanctimoniousApe@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up72·edit-22 个月前With the limits of longevity still being pushed, I’d suggest sticking with the OP binary search theme and start at 64.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·2 个月前Well, round numbers will indeed make the math easier.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 个月前If you like round numbers, 69 is all curves.
minus-squareKlear@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前There was something familiar about the number on the desk. The handwriting was all pretty curves.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前So 64 is absolutely perfect being 1000000 in binary, then all you need to do is go one bit a time for a binary search.
With the limits of longevity still being pushed, I’d suggest sticking with the OP binary search theme and start at 64.
Well, round numbers will indeed make the math easier.
If you like round numbers, 69 is all curves.
What a sexy, sexy number
There was something familiar about the number on the desk. The handwriting was all pretty curves.
So 64 is absolutely perfect being 1000000 in binary, then all you need to do is go one bit a time for a binary search.