• Waryle@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    totally made up definition from your part

    You forgot the “from your part” that is quite important. Language is a consensus, you just invented your own definition and pretend that it is the consensus.

    And anyways, if “social media” and “social network” is the same, why have two different terms for it?

    They’re not the same, it’s the square/rectangle thing. A social network is a kind of social media, all social medias are not social network. You could argue that Whatsapp is a social media but not a social network (but the frontier is getting blurry with groups and these kind of things).

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 minutes ago

      Wat? Sorry, but your definition is even further from anything that could be called a consensus. You could maybe argue that WhatsApp is a social network, but it definitly isn’t social media and it is completly outlandish to claim so. Where do you even get the “media” part in it? You know, compound words are still made up of individual words that have a meaning by themself. Kinda funny that you accuse me of “making up definitions” 🙄

      But sure there are some blurry edges between them. For example, Instagram is primarily used for social media, but the direct messages are more used like a social network.