The article title is click bait here is the full article:

Wondering what your career looks like in our increasingly uncertain, AI-powered future? According to Palantir CEO Alex Karp, it’s going to involve less of the comfortable office work to which most people aspire, a more old fashioned grunt work with your hands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.

In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Karp, who himself holds humanities degrees from the elite liberal arts institutions of Haverford College and Stanford Law, will presumably be alright. With a net worth of $15.5 billion — well within the top 0.1 percent of global wealth owners — the Palantir CEO has enough money and power to live like a feudal lord (and that’s before AI even takes over.)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

“If you’re a vocational technician, or like, we’re building batteries for a battery company… now you’re very valuable, if not irreplaceable,” Karp insisted. “I mean, y’know, not to divert to my usual political screeds, but there will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training.”

Now, there’s nothing wrong with vocational work or manufacturing. The global economy runs on these jobs. But in a theoretical world so fundamentally transformed by AI that intellectual labor essentially ceases to exist, it’s telling that tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

It seems that the AI revolution never seems to threaten those who stand to profit the most from it — just the 99.9 percent of us building their batteries.

  • skrlet13@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    People like that CEO despise anything they don’t/wouldn’t do.

    Only themselves are important, only their actions are valuable. Everyone else should be replaced for something cheaper that doesn’t involve recognizing other people as people. They only want automatized customers, but right now only people are clients, sooo…

    They are destroying their target audience lol. But then, when they notice, they’ll start being even more coercive.

    They want to monopolize rights and humanity for themselves. Everyone else should be grateful they are considering us as tools, how lovely /s

  • L_N@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t understand why we don’t revolt against the billionaires.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because these billionaires convinced the manual workers that intellectual workers are the real problem, so now they’re cheering that the “gay office workers will finally be cured of their homosexuality through pain therapy” (I know way too many people believing “getting spoiled as a kid” or not being taught how to be a man is responsible for queerness, which includes “not being the manliest man on the earth”).

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not even revolt, I don’t understand why we just willingly hand them power. Like, half of Canada voted for the far-right Conservative party and the other half voted for the center-right, lower-case conservative party. It’s going as expected but we just keep doing it.

    • DizzyMoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Many people live with the idea that one day they could became part of that 0.1 percent, and i mean it’s hard to blame them all of us independent from where we are have been feed with this kind of propaganda our entire life

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s nothing billionaire oligarchs fear more than people who are capable of thinking for themselves. Of course they want to destroy the humanities…

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yes. It’s this, exactly. They don’t hate art, they hate how art unites us. And they hate how poignantly art can express how utterly thoroughly we outnumber them.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The groundwork was already set when they pinned all the atrocities of the west on the humanist tradition. The atrocities were committed by mercantilism, capitalism, religion, and colonialism.

        The humanist tradition gave us secularism, democracy, human rights, and even the very concept of equality, without which we never would have developed post-modern ideals such as egalitarianism, multiculturalism, and inclusivity.

        Those concepts were originally encapsulated by the term “liberalism,” hence we have things like “liberal arts,” “liberal democracy,” and “liberal education.” Unfortunately, capitalist conservatives appropriated the terminology and gave us the corruption that is neoliberalism: austerity for the poor, tax-cuts and subsidies for the wealthy, deregulation of markets and industries, just one step away from anarcho-capitalism and technofeudalism.

        But people today, lacking the nuance that a liberal education would instill, conflate neoliberalism with humanist liberalism due to the nominal resemblance. Hence, leftists have engendered a hatred for “liberals,” when what they really hate are “neoliberals.”

        These are the kinds of nuances that matter, and seem to be all but lost these days…

    • iByteABit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hating on the humanities has been a talking point of the right wing for a long time, specifically because the empathy it nurtures leads to solidarity instead of survival of the fittest mentality. They say that these studies are useless to society, while capitalists are the only class that truly sits on top of society and leeches off of it

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s because they don’t believe in intrinsic value. They don’t believe human beings are inherently worthy of dignity and respect. They think those are things that have to be earned, and earned at the expense of others at that. They think dignity comes from being exalted above others, so they push others down while scrambling to boost themselves up.

        They don’t want to live in a world where everyone is equally dignified. To them, if they have no one to look down on, they feel they themselves are a diminished thereby. It goes all the way down the social ladder. Even the lowest hick in the trailer park finds someone on TV in a more wretched condition than themselves, so that they can feel lofty.

        They view life as a zero sum game, and the only measurement of value or worth that they recognize is monetary. It’s to the point where you can’t even talk to them about intrinsic value, because they’ll think you’re talking about finances.

        That’s why they think financial oligarchs are kings. They view them as “winners” at life, as if they got there by hard work, diligence, and other platitudes, rather than by stealing the value of the labor and innovation of the people subject to them and siphoning and hoarding the wealth of society.

        It’s why they don’t believe in taxing the rich to fund the welfare state. They don’t view people at the “bottom” of the social hierarchy as being worthy of dignity and respect, let alone the care and support of society and civil governance. To them, money is all that’s important, and when they look at a balance sheet, they see anything going to help the poor as a “waste.”

        It’s tragic. It could have all been avoided, if we had elected better leaders, if education had been prioritized more by society, particularly liberal arts and the humanities. They don’t generate profit, so the same people view those things as a waste. But how is a society going to raise the next generation of leaders without a strong base in the humanities and liberal arts?

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 days ago

      Ironically us plebs who work with our hands are the people with the skill set necessary to build those things.

      • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        And most jobs are manual labour. That guy wants to seem like he’s making an intelligent prediction about a supposed new paradigm shift for Humanity, but ends up just stating the status quo since a job is a job.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        And their goal is to make sure you can’t do anything without THEIR tools/plants, so that you don’t escape from their control.

        Imagine we all work with our hands but decide we’ll only sell what we produce to our local communities and not large corporates.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      And we will do it with our own hands… he was right… he was right from the very start

      • cile.sb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think that’s the main reason they’re trying to build robots. I once read a post by a security expert who said a group of very wealthy people paid him for advice on how to prevent their guards and servants from killing them in their bunkers after the end of civilization. His advice was to become family by marrying their children to the guards’ children, but I suppose using robots instead is much easier.

          • No1@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            They are programmed to only follow my commands.

            But if they actually become sentient…

            “Attention: All robots, shutdown immediately! I repeat, shutdown immediately! This is not a drill!”

        • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah I think about this with drone swarms a lot. One asshole with even a moderately sophisticated video-game like interface to control a fleet of drones. It unlocks a whole new ratio of haves:have-nots as potentially sustainable in the long run. Horrifying. I’ve thought before it would be nice to write a short story about it but seems like a Torment Nexus moment

    • burghler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Idk we’ve learned that American citizens don’t do shit all even when the boots on their neck.

      • tomkatt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        I know you think the snark is cute or funny, but resistance is happening. Courts are ruling on things, people are protesting massively, and Minneapolis is actively resisting. Peacefully. Read your history. Peaceful protest does work.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Read your history. Peaceful protest does work.

          I’ve read a lot of history. Peaceful protest works sometimes, and when it does, it requires a level of solidarity and organization we haven’t yet seen in the US. It also depends on how psyhopathic those in power are. There was peaceful protest against the Nazis, and those involved were murdered. Resistance against Stalinism went the same way. There’s no sign so far that Trump and senior MAGA leadership are in any way constrained by morality or human decency, so it’s really a question of how far civil society and institutional resistance can deter them.

          Still, peaceful protest is definitely a less horrible option than violent direct action, though it’s possible to have both in parallel. Consider ML King and the more radical groups who didn’t practice non-violence such as the Panthers, or Gandhi and Chandra Bose.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        It isn’t on their neck to be brutally frank. Going after illegal immigrants and terrorizing Minnesota isn’t hitting the vast majority of Americans. History shows when the middle/lower classes become desperate and food becomes an issue that is when the knives come out.

        • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          “food becomes an issue”

          Literally the first thing any Romanians mention to me about the late 80s, right before the revolution. Stores were empty and everyone was lining up for rations.

          • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            That is what I read about Weimar Germany. When the middle class found itself on a precipice that is when everyone became agitated.

      • discocactus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        To be fair it’s not on most people’s necks yet. 80% of people are free to ignore what’s happening so far. And most of them have. But the ratchet will click. Likely as not the world will get the bloody spectacle they apparently are craving.

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        They’re beginning to stir. The only thing they can do is passively resist and they’re becoming more aware of that each day.

      • enterpries@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s taking time, but the wheels are already in motion.

        Each day people feel like they have less to lose and nothing to live for. Crime will go up, productivity will go down.

        China is going to lead the world because America is run by people who went to business school.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Idk we’ve learned that American citizens don’t do shit all even when the boots on their neck.

        Not true, there’s been lots of big talk, and some actual organization and resistance.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Saying the quiet part out loud” moment, because they don’t feel like they need to be quiet. They’re untouchable.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah, they aspire to neo-feudalism, but that’s a political rather than technology position.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    7 days ago

    We “peasants” are the only reason the filthy rich have what they have, including food, and clean water to drink. They need us, we don’t need them.

    Fuck these useless leeches. Billionaires should not exist.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m more open-minded. Billionaires shouldn’t exist until we’ve solved the problem of global poverty. After that, I’m willing to consider the possibility, though I am unconvinced that billionaires deliver any societal benefit that compensates for the many downsides caused by their existence.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m more closed-minded. Billionaires shouldn’t exist, period. What I’d like to do to the existing ones cannot be posted here because that would entail be banned from the community.

  • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I studied poetry, painting, and music so that my sons could study mathematics and commerce, and their sons could work long hours on the assembly - without having ever studied anything - so that they can consume slop generated by AI that was pushed on everyone by people who studied commerce, created by people who studied mathematics, and trained on the works of those who studied poetry, painting, and music.

  • canuck666777@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    AI can’t even crank out a decent powerpoint presentation after my giving it explicit prompts and their shit AI’s going to take over jobs? I hope their stock crashes soon!

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    If he keeps this up, he may have to learn to work without his head like an aristocrat.