• ianonavy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There’s nowhere to dump heat! Modern data centers rely on heat exchange systems that move excess waste energy into the air or earth. The servers will be thermally throttled to a crawl.

    • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      No, that works well with Starlink for example. But only because it’s in low earth orbit. In geostationary orbit You do in fact have a horrible ping.

      Not being familiar with the details of this Elon brain fart I would hope they didn’t aim for geostationary… Because why?? Then again who knows with that idiot.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If it’s close enough for respectable latency, it’s close enough to experience drag. Given the maddeningly high power/cooling and resultant large surface area, then that satellite will have a tendency to incur re-entry.

        So either close enough for “ok” latency but will burn up relatively soon or high enough to keep an orbit longer but terrible latency.

        • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Hmm. Assuming you have some small hydrazine or whatever booster you could maintain a low orbit for a while. But yes not endlessly. That bring said there is a middle ground between 400km and 34000km that might provide for a good orbit and acceptable ping. That all depends on the application of course.