staircase@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agoMeta found liable in child exploitation casewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square145linkfedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down112file-text
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1external-linkMeta found liable in child exploitation casewww.theguardian.comstaircase@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agomessage-square145linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBarneyPiccolo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days agoSo the fine was basically paid by Lunchtime on January 1.
minus-squareBoiglenoight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoYes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful.
minus-squareBarneyPiccolo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoJust an itch to be scratched. Done. What’s for lunch?
So the fine was basically paid by Lunchtime on January 1.
Yes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful.
Just an itch to be scratched. Done. What’s for lunch?