So are we just casually mentioning Graphene in every Android article like Linux is mentioned in every Windows article? How many new phones actually support Graphene?
GrapheneOS without any invasive apps is really bare-bones and limited, that’s what I wanted to say using hyperbole, but I guess figures of speech are too advanced for some people.
Alternatively:
I’ve never even seen Gemini on my phone.
None of my work apps nor my banks app are compatible with Graphene. We need legislation at this point.
I don’t believe you
Okay : https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/issues?q=label%3A"Not+compatible+⚠"
So are we just casually mentioning Graphene in every Android article like Linux is mentioned in every Windows article? How many new phones actually support Graphene?
To be fair, the article itself recommends it.
Fair enough. Unfortunately, that only covers around 5% of Android users in the US.
Pretty much. For all the same reasons. Both of them solve all sorts of problems.
The circlejerk around Graphene is insane, it wouldn’t be as bad if it wasn’t literally only supported by Pixel phones that have 2% marketshare
deleted by creator
I’m aware, thank you.
Yeah. If you never install software that is.
A C64 doesn’t run invasive software either.
Yes. A GrapheneOS device and a Commodore 64 are basically the same thing.
GrapheneOS without any invasive apps is really bare-bones and limited, that’s what I wanted to say using hyperbole, but I guess figures of speech are too advanced for some people.