• graycube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was in a computer store a few years ago watching a young guy trying to sell a tablet to an older woman. He said “the good news about this is that it can’t get viruses because it runs apps”.

    • TheV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tztztz…didn’t he know that a full virus protection is only achieved when you run apps that run ads?

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you assume that she will only install official apps, that they are sandboxed and Apple doesn’t allow viruses in App Store apps, then that statement seems fine to me.

      Every networked computer has some risk of getting a viris of course.

      • renzev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean yeah like you can be a pedant about it but all in all its a statement that makes sense. Apps on both android and ios are very sandboxed, even if you go out of your way to install malware there’s very limited damage it can do, barring zerodays in the sandboxing itself.

          • vivendi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Honestly? They’re based for being so easy to make

            For the record, I am a C/Dart/Rust native dev 2+ years deep in a pretty big project full of highly async code. This shit would’ve been done a year ago if the stack was web based instead of 100% native code

            • v0rld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Easy to make? Have you worked with JavaScript before? It’s an absolute mess and full of footguns.

              And I assume your project doesn’t use async code for shits and giggles? Async code is just as hard in JavaScript except that everything is single threaded anyway.

              And even assuming that it really is easier to make: I’d rather have fewer well made applications than hundreds of crappy ones. Each fucking application having to redistribute a whole ass browser is insane, and they’re all slow despite needing massive resources.

  • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The top bit got me recently, I hadn’t needed to remote into my desktop in a while and searched “Remote” and “RDP” and found nothing. Eventually I found it was renamed to the windows app and finally logged in but was baffled as to why they would do that.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is the dumbest rebranding ever. If I tried really hard to make it as dumb as possible, I’d still not be able to come up with such a horrendously bad idea.

      • ooo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Even if they renamed it to “Now You Too Can Have Magical Long Fingers and Vision” it would be somewhat descriptive of what it does.

  • kaeurenne@lemmy.kadaikupi.site
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am questioning whether it’s true that Microsoft is attempting to implement more brand-based marketing, ecosystem lock-in, and a walled garden by rebranding Remote Desktop as a Windows App. Yes, I agree that everything now uses “app” in computer terminology; at least, it seems so. What if one day even the OS kernel is called an app too? Lol