• ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The workaround

    Quit using YouTube directly and proxy your request through an Invidious instance.

    Your requests are mixed in with everyone else’s, ad’s are blocked and most importantly only 1 machine touches YouTube directly and that’s the server hosting Invidious.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Unless the instance owner is a network god, they blacklist the IP address almost immediately (they see thousands of videos watched at the same time from the same IP address, trivial to detect)

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Most people don’t even know what Invidious is, let alone the fact that there are other video hosting sites that aren’t youtube (Vimeo, for one).

          Invidious is always breaking, too, and most people will stop using it when that happens.

          We are talking about most people, not the absolutely tiny minority of technical users who are aware that such a thing as Invidious even exists.

        • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I wonder what percentage of views are done with a general purpose web browser vs. YouTube apps on phones and TVs. Otherwise, yeah, if you have a web browser it is an option. And since this thread is about browser extensions, I too am wondering what they meant.

        • OmegaSunkey@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You see how often growing youtubers complain about more than 85% of their viewers are not subscribed to the channel, or how just some videos have more views than their main content? The issue is that Invidious doesn’t have the algorithm Youtube provides to everyone, and that not a lot of people really watch their subscribed page.

          • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It’s almost irrelevant to subscribe to a channel, the algorithm anyway pushes whatever it wants ignoring your requests

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            more than 85% of their viewers are not subscribed

            Why would you have an account in that hellhole?

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Some of us made Gmail accounts long before Youtube even existed, and still rely on youtube for tutorials and other things of that nature that aren’t found anywhere else.

              Don’t be a pretentious dick about it.

          • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You see how often growing youtubers complain about more than 85% of their viewers are not subscribed to the channel, or how just some videos have more views than their main content?

            I actually don’t watch a whole lot of YouTube anymore so I can’t really comment on this here.

            The issue is that Invidious doesn’t have the algorithm Youtube provides to everyone,

            But isn’t this what people are trying to avoid when it comes to digital privacy? User data being used in less algorithms?

            • OmegaSunkey@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              But isn’t this what people are trying to avoid when it comes to digital privacy? User data being used in less algorithms?

              Yes. Invidious and other programs, websites and anything else are useful for these kind of things. When you go to another house and in another computer you want to see some video but not affect the watch history of the user that uses the computer mainly. Or just simply watching some video that you wouldn’t normally watch.

              But most people who use YouTube actively on their main computer binge-watch. Sometimes they follow creators, sometimes they follow what the algorithm recommends them for the day. Invidious does not have such algorithm, since its a proxy. So, it is really not for everyone.