I apologize if this is old news, but I just noticed it. It looks like Kagi has added Fediverse Forums as a default Web search option.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool. Wish more search engines would do that.

    But, as far as Kagi goes, it’s a paid service and it’s an American company. So I won’t be using them.

    • Wolfram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not using Kagi because its an American company is valid. But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product. There is still a transaction with a free product.

      Kagi is not free because they respect your privacy and don’t sell your data.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have donated €1500 to opensource software projects and paid a whopping €7 for software. These (privacy respecting) projects got my money because they weren’t transaction based. Capitalism is not the only way.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d happily pay for search, but Kagi is way too expensive.

        10 searches a day, for $5/month? (US)

        Like, that is way too much.

        I can receive thousands and send thousands of emails per day for that price. Is search really that much more expensive?

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          $10/m is unlimited searches though…

          And yeah, searches are actually quite expensive. There’s a LOT of infrastructure that goes into making something unique with your own search engine that isn’t just a wrapper over Google.

          The actual compute cost per search, in 2024, was $0.0125. Kagi states they want to keep Costa below $0.015 per search, but their search partners are a major expense.

          That ofc ignores all the supporting infra, devs, support…etc that goes into making it all possible.

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The business model just doesn’t make sense then (using search partners).

            Because $60, let alone $120 US, a year is far more than most people would be willing to pay.

            Dunno what to say, it’s just more than most people can justify paying for the service.

            I’m gonna stick with DuckDuckGo and the newly free mullvad cached search

            • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, the business model works? They make money, they pay staff, and they are growing.

              I don’t know what you’re talking about, people have price sensitivity of course. You are projecting yours onto “everyone”, is it not a successful business?

              There’s a niche they cater to, if you are not that niche then you are not that niche. Doesn’t mean the niche doesn’t exist.

        • technopagan@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have the same issue with them. I recently churned from Kagi after being a paying Pro customer. 10,-/month is simply too much. I’m paying for email (1,-/month) and web hosting (1,-/month) and web search should be in that price range to make it an attractive offer for people.

          I wrote to Kagi saying as much when I churned (also criticizing that most of their changelog messages are about LLM updates for “Ultimate” customers), but they responded saying that they believe in their offer and that the trajectory of new users signing up gives them confidence.

          I am, however, not willing to shell out Streaming Service level pricing (services that stream hundreds of GB to me every month) for some web searches.

          As much as it pains me due to Brave being involved in the whole crypto scam business and their CEO apparently being another a**hole tech fascist, I am using Brave Search for now. Its results were not inferior when I compared them to Kagi and I don’t need 95% of all the extra fluff that Kagi offers.

          As soon as there’s an offer for private search results with their own index that is not censored nor ad-driven, that company (maybe Kagi!) will have my money. But it needs to be commodity-priced like mail or hosting.

          • Shrouded0603@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nothing wrong with using brave but what about duckduckgo? For me personally its the best all rounder

        • rsolva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And Qwant is really great! Have been using og for a couple of years, and have no need to fall back to Google, DDG etc.

          • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, but not fully. They have their own index as well. They have also recently started a partnership with Ecosia to focus more on that effort.

      • denshi@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://metager.org/ is run by a German non-profit. Since late last year it’s pay to use because their advertising partner (Yahoo) cancelled their contract without warning. But it’s cheaper than Kagi. Also the non-profit is part of the project that’s building the European OpenWebIndex ( https://ows.eu/ ) that’s releasing this year.

        • Shrouded0603@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I used it a Little before it became to pay use and I was honestly impressed by search results (I was used to ddg, ecosia and qwant atp and mainly use ddg)

            • _pete_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re all based on others indexes to be honest so there isn’t really one.

              DuckDuckGo is Bing, Startpage is Google, Kagi is seemingly a mishmash of a bunch of search engines (including the Russian owned Yandex) Brave is independent but owned and run by assholes so that isn’t much better.

              Personally I like Kagi enough and it’s independent enough for me to pay for it.

              • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s the problem, really. They all have pros and cons.

                Kagi is American, so they are out for me. So is DuckDuckGo.

                I don’t care if startpage uses the Google index, since Google isn’t profiting from my data or from ads.

                Their servers are in the EU, and the balance between privacy and usable results is good enough.

                I see it like using a third-party front end for YouTube. All of the benefits with none of the risks or private data theft.

                • Shrouded0603@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Also maybe unpopular opinion but there is nothing wrong with google receiving Money for their services per se. It is just all the other disgusting business practices that google is justifiably hated

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Writing them off as an American company is totally valid, but I’m happy to pay for a quality service because it keeps ads out and lets me vote with my money. It’s really not much to cling to psychologically, but it helps. When I and others completely degoogle our lives it moves no needles at GoogHQ, but paying subscriber metrics are a KPI discussed in every board room in the world.

      • clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lile they say, perfection is the enemy of privacy! Kagi has been the best as an engine out of all I’ve tried. If a better competitors comes up, I’ll give em my money.