Original post: https://bsky.app/profile/ssg.dev/post/3lmuz3nr62k26

Email from Bluesky in the screenshot:

Hi there,

We are writing to inform you that we have received a formal request from a legal authority in Turkey regarding the removal of your account associated with the following handle (@carekavga.bsky.social) on Bluesky.

The legal authority has claimed that this content violates local laws in Turkey. As a result, we are required to review the request in accordance with local regulations and Bluesky’s policies.

Following a thorough review, we have determined that the content in question violates local laws in Turkey, as outlined in the legal request. In compliance with these legal provisions, we have restricted access to your account for users.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The site/system made by the guy who enabled Trump and Neo-Nazis to be platformed is bowing down to authoritarians? I’m shocked, shocked to find out that the rich person obeys the other rich people!

    • SlothMama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Honestly at this point I want to host a distributed Lemmy instance and completely ignore all country laws in favor of complete and absolute freedom of speech.

      It might sound extreme, but pretty sure at this point I’d be willing to die for it given the state of global politics.

        • SlothMama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Who the fuck said anything about porn of any kind? People always use protecting kids as a way to censor the Internet and it’s almost always in bad faith.

          • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You did.

            completely ignore all country laws in favor of complete and absolute freedom of speech.

            If you didn’t realize what you said, hopefully you’ll rethink your goals to include the obvious end results. I suppose you could disallow images of you’re not serious about “complete freedom”, then you just have NeoNazis instead of pedophiles.

            • SlothMama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Your comment is so mired in ignorance, to think you would oppose free speech over how it would be abused and ignore the net positive is exactly how we’re losing freedoms each and every day.

              People like you are ruining the world while telling people you’re fixing it.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Assuming you are serious:

      Bluesky is … arguably ‘federated’, but it is centralized, not decentralized.

      https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20241128-bluesky-decentralization

      Their model (AT Protocol) relies on a central, authoritative … ‘Relay’, that all ‘federated’ users and posts on federated PDS (personal data servers) must go through, to actually reach the ‘AppView’, ie, what all other people/users can actually see.

      So, this is not a many to many, tangled spider web of connections, the way lemmy, and other parts of the actual fediverse are.

      It is a top down hierarchy, a pyramid.

      And Bluesky runs the Relay, the chokepoint.

      If Bluesky cuts off the PDS your account is on, everyone on it is now gone.

      The actual fediverse, Mastadon, Lemmy, etc, runs on ActivityPub.

      In that model… every instance is essentially self contained, and every instance that is federated communicates with every other instance that is federated.

      Each instance can decide what other instances they want to federate with… and users on each instance can personally block even more other users, communities, or entire instances if they choose to, but that only effects what that particular user sees.

      That is what you call decentralized, approaching, or also having elements of being ‘distributed’.

      To bring up an example without getting into the drama that led to it:

      The ‘Tankie Triad’ of ml, lemmygrad and hexbear have had a number of other instances defederate from them.

      But, there are also a good number of instances that have not done so.

      So that means if your account is on hexbear… you can’t see or post on an instamce that has blocked your instance.

      But, if you (a hexbear…ian?), post on a neutral instance… users on that neutral instance will see the post.

      But but, if a user from an instance that has defederated from hexbear goes to to the neutral instance… they will not see the hexbearian’s post.

      This sounds complicated, and it is, but … thats the whole point of a decentralized system. It is more complex in the abstract… but the entire system ends up being more robust, more adaptable, more customizable… without a central authority in direct control of the entire system.