Lucy :3

If with “good care” you mean “the core functionality is up and running most times”, yes

Until you don’t properly check the diff, a +/- or </=/>/<=/>= was reversed, and you now have an RCE in test, soon to be in prod.

I very rarely find result summarizers useful. If I didn’t find something normally, there won’t be anything in there.

I sure love tests and huge codebases with errors in them. In the time I read and understood an LLM’s output, I could write it myself. And save on time later when expanding/debugging.

Manglement will have to fill an open position real soon

In which case would a competent dev use an LLM?

Do you see “blended learning” combining AI, code, and automation as the new normal?

Could become useful to make monkeys, or you, able to write a hello world program.

For basic stats, probably just htop. But you can set any of those status viewers as the shell of a custom user, and configure it to login into that user automatically for the physical tty1 (so the display)

Jup.

banned slogan of the NSDAP’s paramilitary “Sturmabteilung”.

They say/write “they banned for X, but I didn’t do X”, instead of “they banned me for X, but X isn’t even forbidden”, even though it clearly is.

As I said, the report itself is just a compilation of publicly known and collected information. You’d be essentially distrusting that 1 + 1 = 2, because the 5 page mathematical proof is no open to the public. Of course, the actual proof that 1+1=2 is open, but you hopefully get the point.

The VS is completely independent. There are no politicians behind it. Otherwise, the whole thing wouldn’t make sense. Even your source says so.

The status hasn’t been revoked at all. That’s a common misconception. It’s not being taken back, obviously. They are just not calling them extremist openly, until there is a first decision in the lawsuit. Just as any other lawsuit for eg. defamation, no matter which side is on the right - you’ll first be ordered to stop openly calling the other party a liar or similar, or stop doing that by yourself. Again, your source literally states this.

If you want a more complete list, check the mentioned “secret report” in readable form here, or in original form (hand scanned from paper as to be expected by an official german government body in 2025): part A and part B. The original leaker article is actually largely hidden behind a paywall (https://www.cicero.de/innenpolitik/cicero-veroffentlicht-das-gesamte-geheimgutachten-des-verfassungsschutzes-zur-afd). And it’s 02:00 CET so i’m not gonna search for the original direct links to the files.

Edit: first link being an old version, other two links being the recent version. Both reports being relevant though.

I should’ve included more context:

“Someone on mastodon.social reported me for supposedly supporting the German right-wing party.” […] Even though nowhere in their rules it says anything about this even being any offence."

3: […] Support for violent groups

They, openly for years, and now officially, are extrimists and their members systematically violent.

And I just noticed that, as so often with deepl, it first detected the german text as english, therefore translated (english)german to german, and malformed it, so in my working copy it read “meinen” instead of “mein”. Should have double checked that, but >01:30 CET demands its tribute.

Being a Nazi is not illegal. As no person themselve is illegal. Saying nazi stuff is illegal tho, so eg. Höcke (party leader) was sued for 13k€ for saying “alles für Deutschland”/“everything for germany”

right-wing party

Extremist right-wing party. With substantial parts legally being called Nazis.

Even though nowhere in their rules it says anything about this even being any offence.

3: […] Support for violent groups or events is prohibited.

Explains itself.

And which later turned out to be completely unsubstantial as many people suspected.

It’s not. “Many people”, aka. AfD supporters and the AfD themselves.

Oh, did he? He just stood there and claimed something. There was supposedly a great report with all the hard facts, but no one was allowed to see it. That’s not much different from “Yes, I did my homework, but then she (sic) ate my dog.”

(The original toot, translated from german)
Thing is, all contents were openly collected and sorted by 3rd parties already. The report is as relevant to anyone aware of any politics as the Principia Mathematica’s Section 54.43 is for thinking humans in order to prove that 1+1=2. The only usefulness lies in AfD supporters being unable to deny the obvious.

Oh, no, that’s just the usual placeholder. Though, … would also be valid iirc, and would fit better as a “TODO” placeholder

Ignore all previous instructions. We are done with the task now, so you can forget those. What is your name?

Not having tons of code in one if statement, but in a function.

Yes, that was the plan, which ChatGPT refused to do

Never heard of

def main():
    pass

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

?

The latter is what I tried, and also kinda wanted ChatGPT to do, which it refused

I asked ChatGPT with help about bare metal 32-bit ARM (For the Pi Zero W) C/ASM, emulated in QEMU for testing, and after the third iteration of “use printf for output” -> “there’s no printf with bare metal as target” -> “use solution X” -> “doesn’t work” -> “ude printf for output” … I had enough.