

It’s not that we don’t want robots doing it - honestly that’d be pretty cool. It’s that we want to be sure the people that are being replaced are being taken care of.
It’s not that we don’t want robots doing it - honestly that’d be pretty cool. It’s that we want to be sure the people that are being replaced are being taken care of.
There will always be some jobs. That’s no guarantee that there will be enough jobs for everyone to live modest lives on.
Why is that the comparison, though? Sears developed mail-order catalogues in the 1800s. That’s what Amazon replaced.
…okay, I really want to know the story behind that picture!
Reading through the article, it seems like one scenario is that a vehicle stopped at an intersection might be about to pull out, endangering another vehicle about to cross? It seems like the thinking is, if you notice a front/side brake light stops being lit as you approach the intersection, it might indicate they’re about to accelerate - be cautious!
I’m not fully convinced either, it seems like a lot of the benefit they’re projecting is based on analysis of historical collisions, rather than any kind of experimental results. It sounds like the study is to justify expanding research to that sort of simulated experimentation, though - I’m curious what that kind of testing would find.
Sounds like it can help oncoming traffic as well as traffic to either side of the vehicle
Pretty confident that’s the intention of that name
Given the state of the US justice system, that’s not much of a gotcha.
For example, my grandad was a killer. Fought Nazis in WW2.
“The AirCar fulfills a lifelong dream to bring the freedom of flight into the hands of everyday people.”
The price? Between $800,000 and $1 million, depending on specs.
It sounds utopian…