I’d agree with that, both are problematic.

A lot of stubs should be deleted until they are expanded, they’re often more confusing than knowing nothing at all. I don’t think an LLM summary will help here though.

Reading a few articles deep is not only a pain in the ass, but is going to dissuade those who won’t do it. There’s also the issue that when you do wade in it might link to something that is poorly cited and confusing. Again, I think an LLM is going to make things worse here.

Wikipedia articles already have lead in summaries.

Fuck right off with this

A future experiment will study ways of editing and adjusting this content.