Images credit goes to u/DigitalNightmare13 from Reddit

Himeka: original post

Ahko: original post

  • 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2024

help-circle

  • Capital Economics analysts warned that some firms use AI as cover for cuts driven by poor financial performance. “For some firms, AI is a way to spin job losses driven by poor financial performance in a more positive light,” they wrote.

    The AI job apocalypse narrative serves multiple purposes: it justifies hiring freezes, explains away poor financial performance, and creates urgency around AI adoption.

    I suspected as much too: that the people in-charge are using AI as a scapegoat so that the anger that would have been directed at them gets turned towards AI instead.

    Given that there’s a vocal minority of Lemmings who blindly hate AI, I’d say their propaganda has definitely found at least some success.


  • Endmaker@ani.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.worldIs the Fediverse stalling?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I appreciate your effort. I was more of a lurker on Reddit, but realised we all got to actively participate here if we want Lemmy (and the Fediverse at large) to succeed.

    Unfortunately, content marketing is a long-term ROI strategy. IMO other marketing means (e.g. ads, influencers) would do a better job of bringing new users onboard in the short term, helping us to tap into the network effect.






  • Artificial Intelligent is supposed to be intelligent.

    For the record, AI is not supposed to be intelligent.

    It just has to appear intelligent. It can be all smoke-and-mirrors, giving the impression that it’s smart enough - provided it can perform the task at hand.

    That’s why it’s termed artificial intelligence.

    The subfield of Artificial General Intelligence is another story.


  • In the ‘Medium’ difficulty category, OpenAI’s o4-mini-high model scored the highest at 53.5%.

    This fits my observation of such models. o4-mini-high is able to help me with 80-90% of the problems at work. For the remaining problems, it would come up with a nonsensical solution and no matter how much I prompt it, it would tunnel-vision on that specific approach. It could never second guess itself and realise that its initial solution is completely off the mark, and try an entirely differently approach. That’s where I usually step in and do the work myself.

    It still saves me time with the trivial stuff though.

    I can’t say the same for the rest of the LLMs. They are simply no good at coding and just waste my time.