Why would I bother?
HarkMahlberg
People keep asking me, and I haven’t really had an answer, but now yeah, I’m thinking I’m back.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
It’s not for the sake of right wing media, it’s for the sake of the normal people who call Los Angeles home.
I get your point, but calling it a war zone is exactly what right wing media wants everyone to hear. It’s a protest, we’ve had one every single weekend since 1/20, in nearly every state, and nobody needed to call the NG.
Let it not go unsaid: fuck waymo, I’m happy to see those death traps burn.
HarkMahlberg@kbin.earthto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•The future of web development is AI. Get on or get left behind.2·1 month agothe potential of accumulating society’s knowledge and being able to present that to people in an understandable way.
We call this Wikipedia, please consider donating to keep it running!
HarkMahlberg@kbin.earthto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•The future of web development is AI. Get on or get left behind.2·1 month agoenergy/efficiency advances
HarkMahlberg@kbin.earthto Technology@lemmy.world•[paper] Evidence of a social evaluation penalty for using AI1·2 months agoThat sounds like treating the symptom rather than the disease. Why automate the toil, when we could remove it instead? The other commenters brought up examples:
generating (the boring) parts of work documents
when I notice auto-generated parts, which triggers that I use AI in turn, and I ask it to summarise all that verbose AI generated content.
The AI wrote a document a human didn’t want to read, so AI then read the document AI wrote. The incentive thereafter is to save, and use, the shorter AI doc over the longer one.
Was any value created by this cycle? We just watered down the information with more automation. In the process, we probably lost nuance, detail. Alternatively, if we all agreed the document wasn’t worth a human’s eyes or keystrokes in the first place… why have the AI do anything? Sounds like we would all be happier to not have the document in the first place.
Sorry, the sarcasm didn’t come through. My joke was that no software is perfect because software is constantly evolving as people’s needs and desires change.
Clown on JS all you like, but if git was perfect within a week of creation, why does it receive updates? 🤔
Stripping the copper wiring from the walls.