

Do they pay people for use of their voice when they get a cheaper voice actor in who sounds just like them?
Do they pay people for use of their voice when they get a cheaper voice actor in who sounds just like them?
Remember how a few years ago 3d displays and VR were being shoved in everyone’s faces? I can see the current “AI” trend going the same way.
There is more than one type of water, but unless your IoT device is a fusion reactor it’s probably just running off the normal blend.
Your average computer user is mainly using it for interacting with various web based services and playing media. Don’t need good input methods for that so tablets are a cheaper and easier to maintain alternative to a laptop.
Tragedy of the commons? Everyone wants to use it, no one wants to put forward the resources to maintain it.
Pirated content of course has no advertising in it, so it makes sense to pay good money for a service that has adverts in it or how else am I going to learn about all those fabulous products I just have to buy?
Doesn’t matter for a distribution, Apple historically also shipped some gpl tools like bash and Samba, they just provide the source for what they have to.
They’ll just do an Apple and publish the source to the bits they have to while keeping the bits they don’t closed source making the os as a whole closed source.
Hence the term “sunk cost fallacy”.
Frankly I’m horrified that it would go that way and wasn’t aware there were cases like this with sound alike voice actors unless the voice was misleading stated to be of someone it wasn’t.