I’m not sure of what you mean at the end there.

I see youtube content. I do not pay for it and they are likely unhappy that I get to use it as they get zero benefit from it.

And still block curse words and specific terms. Fuck this place

I have hated Samsung for so long too though, they are just mini google. I want Android spun off

I have considered it, I used to be an.amdroid fanboy but I detest the privacy invasion concerns and AI.

That said iphones look shit not and are too locked down. Considering linux

Its all soo boring now. The two major changes I got literally yesterday was to lock out pages in te app drawer and only have a scroll and to separate quick actions and notifications…both of which were new features years ago

It is truly a bizzare world, I went there first to be edgy as an early teen and seeing boobs is fun, then I saw a dude live post his murder of a woman he liked while everyone called her names.

It makes a great case for moderation if not banning the internet.

My friend had a plant hire company that used a 2007 ford Mondeo to pull the excavators. America is simple for trucks

I have a new car and the pop ups arw infuriating. New Terms and Conditions, new update available and my least favourite the unskippable randomly timed confirmation request that I will follow the rules of the road…this one makes me angry and interupts my driving.

Living in a boring country weather-wise, I am not looking forward to ecological, political etc effects of climate change…but it was our best May on record.

There is a windows and mobile tab on their website

They used to push their own apps way too hard, and had a terrible UI. But it is a lot better these days. As is evident in this article they are still pieces of shit.

So it doesnt require internet access at all? I would only use these on a disconnected part of my network.

Thanks man, feel like the only one sometimes.

Your argument is built upon the position that it would be impossible to guarantee the veracity when it just is not the case. Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information.

If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible why cant the richest organisations on the planet be held to the same, or preferrably a higher, satandard?

Having non vital people om meetings brings them into the fold, they are not immediately neccessary but its a skills thing. I was dropped strsight into all meetings day one of a new job and it is a great help.

Out of being monitored.

What is your position here, that they dont have a responsibility or they do?

The platform hosts everyone from nazi sympathisers to famed and accredited journalists, should they be presented as equals? Because if there is no onus and it is all caught under the same blanket warning there is a false equivalency being presented.

Except for the users presenting shit as facts and it being promoted through their platform.

They asolutely should and likely do have a duty to challenge falsehoods.

The word private makes people feel like it isnt anyone’s business but that isnt the case.

As someone who only speaks English as a third language after Latin and Mandarin living in Anchorage I tend to agree with you.