Well, not quite.

There are plenty of jobs that require smart people which can be automated a lot.

Business analytics, legal stuff, etc.

They won’t kill the need for expert human minds yet, but the jobs will need significantly less people overall for the same work, which means less jobs in those areas, which then leads to less people being able to learn those jobs and we are headed towards elite humans VS most humans being struggling slave-consumers.

At least from a current perspective.

If universal income or such were a thing all those consumers could focus on creating and learning what they truly like, many turning into experts organically, most likely.

But no, society is too dumb and rigid to adapt to this reality without everything burning to the ground first

I use AI daily and find it useful as a tool. Its also frustrating in its current state. The disgusting default buttlick responses, trying to please the user with fake polite drool. And then the many, many mistakes.

And it’s a new tool, so yea it need to ripen…

And that means to go all in on a company strategic level of AI as a technology is dumb.

When building a product the problem the product solves is to be the center of the work. Not the technology used to achieve the solution.

Also bees don’t really bite. They sting.

Actually mosquitoes are a major food source for other animals.

And wasps are a major aspect of nature’s dead creatures cleanup crew.

Tics we can eradicate tho. They are also a food source but afaik not nearly as big as mosquitoes

You confuse bees with wasps or what

Technically those images would be different without insects.

You wouldn’t believe how dead everything would be without insects.

Humans would have an extinction level event if suddenly all bugs were gone.

OP IS TRYING TO KILL US ALL!

AI is a tool.

A tool that is being used wrong left and right because of hype.

Where it works it works, and where it doesn’t it will break away again.

There are many issues with AI and how it gets it’s data, etc. Yes.

And how too many people treat it makes them to me sound like the monks who complained that the book printing press is killing the soul of books which have to be hand written.

The way many here argua against AI is not logical bit emotional and it sucks

I hope they can tune it to react only to a very specific type of salt water range or else it will not be applicable very often.

And I love this. More if this please

Fake celebrity nudes have been around since… How old is Adobe photoshop now?

It’s just going to be up to a level where it will go full circle and people won’t actually believe true nudes are real because the default expectation is that they are all fake.

Hey! But I don’t wanna use reddit anymore!

Lol. People who do that habitually and addictively will do it with or without AI

It depends.

If the time I save from the summary I generate is used for stuff that is also complex then the effect is not as stated in the article.

For me AI is a tool like many others and when I use it I have to proof read, understand and compare just as much as before because I’ve used LLMs enough not to fully trust their output.

They provide a good starting point and anyone who just stops there and takes that first draft of work as-is has no idea what they want to achieve in the first place