I upvoted this before I saw what community it was in. Now I wish I could upvote twice.
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
TootSweet@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Disney's AI Paradox: Pursues OpenAI Deal While Suing Rival FirmsEnglish33·14 days agoDisney is no stranger to hypocracy of that sort. Look at them making their billions off of the public domain (Snow White, Cinderella, Aladin, The Little Mermaid, need I go on?) while lobbying heavily for longer copyright terms to keep works they made from being similarly adapted.
DALLE LLaMA
describing IntelliJ as “good”.
Shots fired back. 😈
TootSweet@lemmy.worldto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Apache2 attack helicopterEnglish9·1 month agoYeah, I’m about as rabid a Free Software advocate as you’ll likely be able to find, but it’s 100% time we moved on from Stallman.
TootSweet@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Improving the Fediverse to allow it to actually take over the social media space.English0·2 months agoThen make the “one true frontpage” for Lemmy or whatever (implement ActivityPub, maybe borrowing some code from the Lemmy codebase itself, or kindof making a fork of Lemmy), and if it’s good, it’ll be used. If not, it won’t.
But then, it might well fall victim to this phenomenon:
Lemmy has lots of competing “front pages.” How will one more change anything? A more generic domain name or something?
TootSweet@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard.English1·2 months agoas it gets better
Bold assumption.
TootSweet@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.world•Now introducing "haxx", a nonsense hacking generator.English0·2 months agoI’m a little disappointed it’s not a GUI written in Visual Basic. (Kidding, kidding.)
TootSweet@lemmy.worldto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•average day in NPM landEnglish1·11 months agoI’ve literally told my coworkers “I’m not saying we should never use dependencies. But every time you add a dependency, you should hate yourself a little bit more. Some self flagellation can’t hurt either.”
One could make a community named “Anon Posting” or something, lock it so only a mod can post, and then make the sole mod a bot that would post anything it got via DM (probably after automoding, rate limiting, etc) to said community.
I do think it’s a good idea for the bot to keep a log in case it gets abused for sufficiently evil purposes. One could add some extra functionality to the bot that would give identifying information about the poster to instance admins on demand (via DM), but I think instance admins would have pretty easy access to all DMs made to the bot, along with identifying information anyway. (Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong on that.)
Also, the bot could totally delete its logs and with them the identities of all posters after a while. Maybe a month?
And, of course, this wouldn’t be ironclad anonymity. But it would keep identities secret from anyone but the bot maintainer and instance admins.
Yeah, sounds like a pretty cool concept. Not volunteering to write such a bot (at least any time soon) or anything, but I support it.