Seriously?
Look, the one is taking and exploiting nearly all of your data, while giving you 10.000 different well hidden opt out options, the other is taking all of your data for granted while telling you it is for your best and nobody else should have it, and promising they are never ever gonna exploit it, swear with fingers crossed… hm… OK you are right.
You can do that with this novel technology called “a second pair of glasses for reading”.
It works, I can confirm it.
Have a look under these two black paperlike sheets right in the middle, where the RAM probably sits. Maybe there’s room for more.
I want glasses with the ability to clean themselves.
No. There is nobody.
Case closed.
was shut down when the right wing came into power.
…and when M$ moved their headquarters into the city of Munich, making some nice impact on the city treasury.
the fuel is liquid sodium metal, an inexpensive and widely available commodity.
How very stupid we all have been during the last 200 years! /s
We don’t use this “inexpensive and widely available” fuel for making a campfire, or heating a house, or driving a car.
Producing enough sodium metal to enable widespread, full-scale global implementation of this technology should be practical, since the material has been produced at large scale before.
What a bullshit again.
Let us get smarter by looking at the whole cycle of energy:
Sodium metal is used as a carrier of energy in this idea. First we would need to invest energy to create the “fuel”, and later we can use the energy from it.
Now the problem gets obvious: It is not an even balance.
"There’s this natural cascade of reactions that happens when you start with sodium metal,” Chiang says. “It’s all spontaneous. We don’t have to do anything to make it happen
These reactions can only be so spontaneus because there is still a whole lot of energy stored in the sodium hydroxide after the airplane is done with it. And this energy was needed in the beginning, on the way from sodium chloride to sodium metal, but later it can not be used completely for that airplane. A good part of it is wasted afterwards.
IMHO This “gap” in the cycle makes the whole idea much less useful than this guy is telling us.
Besides ansible, also have a look at “templates” and “cloud-init” for VM generation.
Entertainment.
The only thing that will remain on yt anyway after AI has taken over the content generation and we can trust no “creator” anymore.
The biggest issue is that the app and recommendation algorithm isn’t going to be useful with 20 songs.
They are not testing for usefulness.
If your basic logic runs with 5 songs, then give them 5, not 20.
Or pay a fine of half a billion or so, but only 15 years later
Nextcloud…
They are asking for legal trouble anyway, at least in Europe
Did you see the Documentation section in the README.md?
Yes, that’s why I’m asking.
How to use this thing?
Troja has been impossible to conquer. Until.
Or is it rather your definition of security or vulnerability that is questionable.
Google’s updated Play Integrity API
How can these people talk about “integrity” when they break real existing phones?
I call this the opposite of integrity.
When people who have tried to say their opinion with words are already suppressed by the national guards
https://feddit.org/post/13826715
then I (do not exactly approve but) find it somewhat understandable that some find other ways now to tell what they think.