Safety operator was trying to eliminate the witness.

Makes me wonder if there’d be any bits of dust, hair or other substances that could have been embedded in a printed object and might be used as evidence in a case.

They can’t hit you with the ol’ Bobby Tables if you delete the database yourself first. A+, no notes.

Litigious parents, take note: courts typically recognize that children are derivative works. Their appearances tend to fall under fair use, please don’t waste our time and yours trying to sue them for infringement.

So instead of working on fixing an existing problem for anybody, they’re solving a new problem for nobody. Let them eat cupcakes, I guess.