Tailscale is a group of clients on a Tailnet which are all equal, unless you tell it otherwise. That means you need to set the client you installed on your router as a subnet router.
Even then, if you’re not familiar with networking, you’ll probably have duplicate routes if you’re not paying attention. The other option is to just install Tailscale on each server you want access to.
👍
Your default routes are being set incorrectly. If you’re using it as an exit node, then you need to make sure it’s only being used as such for other clients on the Tailnet. You also need to make sure you’re splitting your routes correctly so that the default route on your router isn’t set for something on the Tailnet.
Generally speaking, if you’re not familiar with networking and routing, you don’t need to change the subnet settings if using a Tailscale client on your router. You also shouldn’t be advertising routes from it for your own network, or else you could end up getting issues like you’re seeing because your routing tables will be broken while Tailscale is active.
One more thing: Tailscale on your router doesn’t make it a server, it’s still a Tailscale client. You still need to setup your routing in the Tailscale server to make sure it’s not duplicating routes like this.
Are you sure you can? Did you look up the model number and check for manuals or docs?
It looks like it might be under the black plastic cover to the left of the RAM, or under where you have it placed in your picture. Then again, it could not be accessible from this side of the main board, and you might have to look under the keyboard.
Manual would be better than guessing though.
It depends on the use-case. If this VPS doesn’t have layer7 routing out in front, you have a service that needs to respond from an A/CNAME hostname in combination with an SRV lookup, you have service that uses bidirectional TLS 1.2…etc.
There’s all kinds of reasons you may need multiple static IPs for an instance. If youre just using vhosts for HTTP capable services, don’t worry about it though.
“Old PC” meaning what, exactly? Need some specs.
In general, a Qnap or Synology box is going to be much lower wattage than a full PC.
Lol, okay, bud. Not only are you absolutely wrong and seem to have no professional experience with this whatsoever: search engines, engineering blogs, Wikipedia, history, and every other known source of truth on this disagree with you, yet here you are arguing anyway. Amazing. 😎
Yes, Windows sucks. What’s your question?
Okay, well it doesn’t NEED to be Docker Desktop for sure. There is just a difference in the configurations of how it works, but whatever Desktop can do, docker-ce can do.
For starters, let’s find out why you can’t install drivers. Do you have an error?
It will with Tailscale though, as OP mentioned using. Tailscale clients reach out to DERP endpoints to create the routes they need to communicate with other clients. dNAT wouldn’t matter.
Source: don’t this with Tailscale vanilla and Headscale
Any distro will work.Your issues with driver install should be obvious, but also let us know what card you’re working.
There is a big difference between Docker Desktop and docker-ce when you’re talking about CUDA integration and performance. You probably just want docker-ce with the nvidia-runtime configured.
The easier distros with Nvidia drivers are going to be the Debian, Fedora or Ubuntu flavors, and you need to pay attention to the CUDA requirement which is not always in-line with the stock gaming GPU version of drivers. Nvidia has a compatibility matrix you can lookup with detailed instructions on how to navigate what is what.
DynamicDNS will get you there without having to pay for VPS host traffic prices for ingress though.
How/why are you double NAT’d? Is it the ISP’s fault, or did you setup your own router behind their NAT’d handoff? If the latter, you can work around this.
Some other options to deal with the former:
Regarding Tailscale: you shouldn’t need a VPS for this. Even though you’re stuck with dNAT, the Tailscale client should be able to figure out a way to communicate with you wherever you are with DERP servers. Install on your phone, then a machine at home, and try it out.
That is not what that term generally means. Somebody COULD be running their own cloud platform, but if you’re speaking to a large group of people and you say “Cloud deployed”, they understand that to be deployed to a Cloud Provider on a secured platform and location (AWS, Google, Azure…etc).
We don’t say “cloud” in engineering anywhere without meaning this. We may refer to a non-colocated deployment of something as “edge” or “off-site”, but never “cloud”. There isn’t a single engineer on this planet who would ever confuse “deployed to cloud” to mean somebody’s basement.
“Cloud” infers centralized consolidation of resources in a datacenter. A PaaS, for example.
“Decentralized” infers any number of running instances of something that are not tied to any specific vendor, infrastructure, or location.
Cloud can be distributed, but not decentralized since the underlying controls of the infrastructure are themselves centralized.
According to this paste, you’re not even using inference at all, or rather, it’s using CPU.
Change the release tag and “cpu” to openvino and see if that performs any better.
It’s not “standard practice”, it’s the least problematic way to distribute example templates for mass consumption without needing extra steps for the user to configure. It is assumed that anyone looking to run something in production would follow best practices and harden where needed.
Remember when everybody was making “smart” toasters and fridges and shit with cameras or WiFi for absolutely no reason.
This is that all over again.
Nobody needs “AI” in their water kettles, dryers, or dildos.
Like it or not, any self-hosted project can not be successful if there is no one to appreciate it…
Absolutely wrong. I’ve had multiple I’ve kept going for years because I’ve created them for specific use-cases that literally nobody else touches, and I’ve run and contributed to multiple huge public projects. Never once did I ever think of abandoning the former because nobody else was using them.
This sounds like musing of someone who is new to the scene and thinks it works like social media influencer BS.
It does not.
Yes, if Tailscale on your router is advertising routes, and your other devices while connected to Tailscale are picking up those advertised routes, they won’t be able to figure out how to get to your local network devices if both things are advertising the same routes.