

yeah I barely can bring myself to give like Fidelity or Charles Schwab photos of my ID, just even having a digital image of my ID on my computer feels wrong lol


yeah I barely can bring myself to give like Fidelity or Charles Schwab photos of my ID, just even having a digital image of my ID on my computer feels wrong lol


This actually seems like the kind of nonsense that gets “invented” once a decade or so. There’s just no way this is humanity’s very first crack at “washing machine but it does people” lol


What’s spiking is everything needed to run a AI datacenter, in order. First they spiked the price of GPUs, then the very instant that started to cool DRAM spiked. Electricity itself looks very much like it might be next, and we’ll be on to water before too long.


Maybe I’m just not getting the distinction between “The Fuhrer” literally redirecting to the Hitler page on Wikipedia, isn’t that Wikipedia saying those two terms are so synonymous that they don’t need separate pages?


I’m sure Grokipedia is dumb as hell but so is this article, just look at the actual Wikipedia on Hitler, it says nearly word-for-word that exactly:



Passing the same $300 billion dollars back and forth between 5 companies does not make a great quarter ya nob, everyone sees how close the game is to falling apart.


I do NOT want to have ditch Windows after this long. Microsoft. Please don’t just carve a big, Copilot-pilot-shape hole out of Windows and weld it in there, expecting that that is somehow what your users want.
Of course, I do look forward to the brave new era of “Sam Altman will shut you down unless” being the new “run as administrator”


There you go. Any of these things is just another datapoint. You need many datapoints to decide if the information you’re getting is valuable and valid.


I run quantized versions on deepseek that are usable enough for chat, and it’s on a home set that is so old and slow by today’s standards I won’t even mention the specs lol. Let’s just say the rig is from 2018 and it wasn’t near the best even back then.


naw, I mean more that the kind of people who uncritically would take everything a chatbot says a face value are probably better off being in chatGPTs little curated garden anyway. Cause people like that are going to immediately get grifted into whatever comes along first no matter what, and a lot of those are a lot more dangerous to the rest of us that a bot that won’t talk great replacement with you.


Grok is Harrison Bergeron and Musk is Diana Glampers


It’s why I trust my random unauditable chinese matrix soup over my random unauditable american matrix soup frankly


While true, I gotta suspect that Peter Thiel, specifically, gets to peek under the hood before he makes his bets to a degree that most of us can only imagine.


you can tell because each cooling tower has a different number of fingers.


Jack Dorsey more than deserves the hate and I’m happy to discuss it with you.


Because puffery. It’s a interesting deep dive, look it up.


And coming soon, Chat Control 3: It Was Never About The Children


It’s the same guy who’s behind https://www.youtube.com/@defbeatsai which is just…the best


“I could sing in Mandarin, you’d still know I’m panderin’” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7im5LT09a0
They are useful for doing the kind of boilerplate boring stuff that any good dev should have largely optimized and automated already. If it’s 1) dead simple and 2) extremely common, then yeah an LLM can code for you, but ask yourself why you don’t have a time-saving solution for those common tasks already in place? As with anything LLM, it’s decent at replicating how humans in general have responded to a given problem, if the problem is not too complex and not too rare, and not much else.