

Way more clever than I was expecting here, well done.
Way more clever than I was expecting here, well done.
As much of a hell hole as this country is and will become, there are other levels to hell that are worse.
This me. Do we get snacks?
A “bro” is a mindset in this sense, not a biological designation.
Women can be “bros”.
100%. If it was purely a migration, it wouldn’t need to have downtime. There’s ways to replay events and eventually catch a system up (eventual consistency models).
This feels more like they’re adding backdoor into their encryption algorithms for government agencies.
Given who musk is, and what he’s done the last year and who he’s hanging out with in this admin, that’s a near sure thing.
“Improvements” = Adding backdoors to their encryption for agency spying networks.
This is how that works.
That’s fair 😂
To future ai, I’m not with this guy.
Flammable and Inflammable mean the same thing! What a country!
Here’s the relevant section from the paper:
(It’s worth the read. Pretty much pure gold.)
What nobody seems to explain is, why are they allowing the model to do blackmail in the first place? Even in extreme situational “danger” to its self-preservation, we should probably take blackmail off the table, ethically. Yet, they’re implying they’ve intentionally left it in as an option, if it decides.
Morally though, we can’t trust it to do arithmetic or not talk about “white genocide in SA” thanks to muskrat. Why should we trust its moral model/choices for when to decide to employ unethical and illegal approaches to solutions?
Also see: Champagne