How did you get that point from my comment?

So… that means one side of Gaza is sensible and the other isn’t? That’s the only take after their last comment.

Just pointing out that with their last comment, their other point can be taken as one side being sensible, while the other isn’t.

What does that have to do with boot licking?

Fantastic point, right up until that last sentence. But I guess people just want to circle jerk eh?

Man your comment was really impartial and well thought out, until that last comment. So close…

I am a compliance expert.

Yet you claim there is two party consent for video, won’t provide anything to support that claim, and the one link you did specifically says it doesn’t…

. I too am confident in my assessment of the legal situation.

People can be confidently wrong, like in this case…

Awwwwhhh I upset muffin by using logic and reason to refute them.

Is it so odd, that someone knows how to read and understand code and law books? It’s part of any tradesperson training.

I know it’s not a thing, from plenty of research into my own camera systems, and I am confident that I know the results I found are correct, because I know how to understand code and law books.

And no it doesn’t, but the lack of any results shows that you’re full of fucking shit.

Again, just because someone swears doesn’t mean they are being aggressive! It’s common repertoire for a lot of working people! Sorry princess!

I’ve never heard of that before… and Google shows zero results for “states with two party consent for video recording” all links are for audio… what state… please… how many times do I need to ask nicely so we can solve this?

Just because you’re wrong and got called out doesn’t mean the other person is being aggressive lmfao.

No… your link even specifies that….

L

O

Fucking

L

It’s the internet, people can swear dude.

That applies to audio… not video recordings mate.

Why are you telling me to chill? Because I used a bloody swear word…?

What country? I’m sure there’s exceptions that you don’t know about, the laws normally don’t disallow their use, it’s in how the data is stored.

A security system that doesn’t record, but is watched by someone would be legal anywhere for example. Just the fact that there’s one, means sweet fuck all.

What places?

Usually it’s a misinterpretation of the law, they are not meant to interfere with security and law enforcement. There’s always exceptions, usually it’s how they trigger or store the data. If it’s automatically wiped, usually no laws have been broken for example.