Also known as snooggums on midwest.social and kbin.social.
I’ve also had lots of cases where I tell it I don’t want it to edit any code, just to analyze and explain something that’s there and how to update it… and then I have to stop it from editing code anyway, because halfway through it forgot that I didn’t want edits, just explanations.
I find it hilarious that the only people these LLMs mimic are the incompetent ones. I had a coworker that changed things when asked to explain constantly.
Reasoning is limited
Most people wouldn’t call zero of something ‘limited’.
or assumes available street parking will always exist in places and times it almost never does.
That explains all the amazon vans parked in the middle of the fucking street.
OpenAI is not doing this to defend anyone’s privacy but their own. Their entire business model is based on using everyone’s data, including private data.
This is pure selfish greed.
Firefox + ublock origin + sponsorblock and I haven’t seen an ad on youtube in all the years since I started that combo.
False logic errors created by the AI while asking it to solve real world logic errors?
Not even a new thing either. Barely any jobs are done because people want to do specific types of work, and those jobs tend to be severely underpaid (teaching, social services).
People didn’t flock to factories in the 60s and 70s because they wanted to work in a factory, they wanted the pay and benefits. Same for office work today.
No matter who wins, everyone loses.
Right now they do between a combination of extra oversight, generally travelling at slow speeds, and being resticted in area. Kind of like how children are less likely to die in a swimming pool with lifeguards compared to rivers and beaches without lifeguards.
Once they are released into the wild I expect a number of high profile deaths, but also assume that those fatalities will be significantly lower than the human average due to being set to be overly cautious. I do expect them to have a high rate of low speed collisions when they encounter confusing or absent road markings in rural areas.
The “AI agent” approach’s goal doesn’t include a human reviewer. As in the agent is independent, or is reviewed by other AI agents. Full automation.
They are selling those AI agents as working right now despite the obvious flaws.
I assume they haven’t caught on because they think it will work soon due to not understanding the current problems are fundamental issues with the current offerings.
The current problems cannot be fixed by scaling or using different training data, the core design introduces hallucinations errors. How many decades will it take for companies to catch on and be willing to admit it though?
Plus the options are frequently hidden and unclear.
I thought disabling One Drive on my Windows machine would keep it from syncing to the cloud. Nope, it just changed where the files were stored but Windows copies it to One Drive even when One Drive isn’t running.
In the case of google, I assume that turning off the Gemini bullshit doesn’t have any impact on it copying all the content to their servers even if you don’t see it happening.
Based on their username and posts they are here to troll.
Hmmm
It did work the second time, but that gave me a chuckle as the very first attempt.
Acting like the entire history of the philosophy of knowledge is just some attempt make “knowing” seem more nuanced is extremely arrogant.
That is not what I said. In fact, it is the opposite of what I said.
I said that treating the discussion of LLMs as a philosophical one is giving ‘knowing’ in the discussion of LLMs more nuance than it deserves.
Just slap the fediverse in place of the ‘please stay off social media’ rectangle.
continues
At first I thought that might be a Pepsi reference, but you are probably too young to know about that.
Trying to treat the discussion as a philisophical one is giving more nuance to ‘knowing’ than it deserves. An LLM can spit out a sentence that looks like it knows something, but it is just pattern matching frequency of word associations which is mimicry, not knowledge.
I agree with the author.
The fact that they only work up to a certain point despite increased resources is proof that they are just pattern matching, not reasoning.