But the manosphere doesn’t need to be a symptom of those problems. That’s a choice.

Another choice could be that men band together to identify the real problems and address those.

For example. In the manosphere, women are considered gold diggers. Well, because of the patriarchy, men are told that it is their job to provide, and that their value is tied to how well they provide. So you have men who think it’s their job to provide money, and then are complaining when women see them as a source of money. This is stupid. Men could stop trying to be providers, and instead try being people who are interesting to talk to and nice to be around. That would solve both the golddigger problem and the loneliness problem. It would also start to address some of the capitalist problems, where people are willing to self-exploit, just to get a little more money than their neighbor.

The manosphere is easy to understand. People hate doing work and taking accountability. So just blame the problems on someone else, and watch my podcast and buy my shit.

They CAN regulate the company, if the people want it.

They clearly didn’t

deleted by creator

Your complaining that the free stuff isn’t as good as the paid?

Your brain doesn’t have real time traffic information.

Exactly. That’s why you had to fill out all the KYC paperwork when you create your Bitcoin wallet.

Oh, you didn’t?

Crypto is not hidden, but it can be anonymous. You can’t hide that you got money from X account and spent it at Y account. But there’s no name tied to the transaction.

Soylent dogs

The problem is not with the buyers.

Natively, you can’t. Hackishly, you could put a small VPN capable router in front of it that would manage the connection.

That’s according to Dr Internet, so I haven’t tried it, but it seems very likely to be accurate.

You’ve basically just reinvented off shoring.

CEO don’t just run company. Their job is also to determine strategy and work relationships to improve sales/donations. They should be hired wherever they can do that best.

Why would there be an answer?

If #3 is your use case, then yeah, pony up the fees. Or learn to code I guess.

No, I don’t think you can get a competent CEO for less than 200k in the tech sector.

I’m sure a roofer would gladly be willing to take over my job as well.

Do you think there are no requirements to being a CEO? Do you think you could do it? I’m wondering how deep this justice fantasy goes. Do you think we’d get a competent CEO at minimum wage?

I hate that people treat the US like a country. It’s bad for statistics.

The cost of living in New Jersey is 50% higher than Alabama, for example, using the site you linked. Averages across the US are near meaningless.

Since I’m talking about tech jobs, we should compare to states with lots of tech jobs, and we might get a better comparison.

You can’t just look at the exchange rate. You have to look at cost and standard of living.

Someone in the US making 100k is not doing as well as someone in France making 70k€

You can’t at all compare unless you reference cost and standard of living. I’ve managed and hired people in multiple countries. It’s not as simple as salary X exchange rate.

Still not getting it I think.

Why would someone choose a more stressful job for the same pay?

This does not imply a lack of more stressful jobs that pay less. Obviously every idiot would take an easier job that pays more if they could.

Oh, and don’t forget about this one!

I didn’t forget. I chose to ignore it because it makes you look tacky and I’m being polite. But if you insist on pressing the point, there you go.

You’re missing the point. There are easier jobs in the same industry for the same pay.

We’re not comparing tech CEO to roofers. We’re comparing them to other people in tech.