Good time-of-day, Linux users! I hope you will take kindly1 to coming here to tell you about Konform Browser and what it is. And also ask you to try it out in case this is your cup of tea :)
In short, Konform Browser is a web browser with the goal of promoting user freedom and access to the rights of security, privacy and anonymity. It is intended as a general-purpose browser fit both for daily online surfing as well as targeted deployments in secure or untrusted environments. It is fundamentally a patched build and custom configuration of Mozilla FireFox ESR. It started as a fork of LibreWolf and now stands on its own four feet.
Some highlights to give an idea to those familiar with LibreWolf or other FF fork:
- Security: Konform is based on Firefox ESR instead of Rapid Release. This means a more stable base without missing out on the latest security updates, in exchange for longer time waiting for the newest features from Firefox. It also enables shorter lead times to backport upstream updates.
- In this sense (and a few others), Konform Browser is closer to IceCat/GNUZilla than it is to Librewolf.
- Freedom: Konform allows a higher level of customization. It gives the user control and trusts you with that responsibility. Some examples:
- Allows enabling dark mode and following system theming even when Resist Fingerprinting is enabled
- Allows installing your own self-built unsigned add-ons
- “Spoof referer source” user configuration option
- Privacy and security: Disables all browser features relying on external network connections.
- “RemoteSettings” is completely disabled2.
- No cloud “AI” integrations. You can run Konform on a disconnected network and not notice any reduced functionality.
- All telemetry, metrics, and ads from the browser disabled.
- OCSP turned off (but we have CRLite).
- tcpdump and see the difference!
I should add that even if we contrast with LibreWolf above, this is not at all meant as a dig or criticism. I think they have done and continue to do great contributions for the benefit of all of us. That we chose it as upstream and that it’s the easiest to compare with is a testament both to how closely aligned we are and that Konform has a lot to thank Librewolf and the wider Firefox customization community for. Like they built from Librefox and Arkenfox to bring private browsing to a wider audience, so are we but the next to try help widen and deepen the browser ecosystem.
The recommended installation method is building from source but there are also binary packages for x86_64 and arm64 built by Codeberg CI. Currently Linux only, considering Android next and could use some assistance with that.
Doors open for users, testers and contributors. Looking forward to hear what you think and if there’s anything missing!
1: Disclosure: Am dev. This is a rewritten crosspost.
2: This means that local full-page translation is also unavailable even if in principle it should be possible to bundle and run translations fully locally. It’s just the way Mozilla built it. Patches towards allowing users to enable fully offline translations would be very welcome.
Sources: https://codeberg.org/konform-browser
Deb / RPM / Tarball / Container image
See releases for details.
Super, does it have an overrides configuration file like Librewolf does?
Yes! In fact while the browser otherwise has its own branding, it does recognize override config as
librewolf.overrides.cfgso you can literally just drop your existing LibreWolf overrides file into~/.konformand it should pick it up. Figured this would make it smoother for people migrating from LW or switching between the two.Thanks, I will remove the preferences in my configuration that Konform enables by default. By reading the differences between the both browsers I can already tell it has saner defaults than Librewolf.
I am very happy with Librewolf and it has been my goto broswer for the past 2 years or more, but it’s great to see alternatives showing up now and then.
Can’t wait to see what Ladybird and Servo browsers do. That will be truly spectacular when it happens.
Need one for android
deleted by creator
Lol sorry. I am new here!
I mean technically Android is still somehow Linux so ^^. But it does feel funny when the first (and only?) follow-up comment on the Linux community of this Linux software is about needing an Android version instead :p
The more interested people we have checking it out and poking at the code, the higher chance we can ship Android builds Soontm. Feel free to swing by and stay tuned ;)
Sorry, but there’s already a librewolf replacement for android: IronFox
IronFox: Exists. Currently mostly due to hard thankless work of one or two individuals.
somerandomperson: OK they got this; everyone else stop trying and go home now
I don’t think dismissing the issue so quickly is fair to either the IronFox maintainer, the state of Android web security, or browser diversity. It is also discouraging for anyone else considering exploring this and sharing their work in public. We need more people working on an open and free mobile browser ecosystem, not less.
Have you heard of TOR
I prefer Brave
How have you missed the huge amount of posts, articles, videos etc. all over the web about why you shouldn’t use brave? Seriously, I’ve never used it and see that all the time.
Not personally daily-driving or actively recommending it but I’ve had to look closely at Brave as part of browser security work.
Most of the posts, articles and videos I’ve seen that don’t apply approximately equally to the other big names are mostly backed by arguments like “I don’t approve of BE behavior and BE made Brave therefore Brave bad”, “crypto scammers bad therefore crypto bad and Brave uses crypto therefore Brave bad” or “it’s being promoted by bad people and therefore bad”. I think such arguments are in themselves without merit, should be dismissed and are not sufficient to tell others they shouldn’t use it. Tribalism isn’t healthy. An opinion being widely shared doesn’t make it true. Your trusted influencer being upset doesn’t mean you need to be.
Valid criticisms of Brave and valid reasons for not using the browser exist but that’s rare to see written out but buried deep under the bulk of FUD, groupthink and uninformed meme-takes we find all over the stuff shared on socials. On the privacy and security sides it’s very much a mixed bag. Scrolling through Brave
flagsI note more than one thing I think we can take inspiration from. For people locked into corpware and limited to what’s on the major app stores, you can certainly do worse. Yet I see little concern-blogging overCopilot 365 .NET LiveEdge or Samsung Internet Browser, for example.Of course I’d personally love if you used Konform Browser (or any other non-chromium browser) instead but I mostly see people bashing Brave for completely confused reasons. Yes there’s bloat and ads and telemetry and problematic trust and outbound networking going on out of the box. Yes they inject their own monetization into the user experience if you blindly click “Next, Next, I agree, Next” and run with defaults. All just like for Firefox these days. And just like Firefox, user configuration exists to improve on much of that while the software license and open source code afford fixing the rest for the willing. The differences I’ve seen when it comes to the browsers are mostly in degrees, not fundamental. Maybe we should have a Brave fork too.
I hope I’m not canceling myself, here…
Another fork freeloading off the Mozilla security team’s work.
Another useless corporate shill wasting everyone’s time.
Very weak argument
Low-effort snark.
