It’s much more than just inline styles. It’s also design constants (e.g. color palettes, sizing etc.) and utilities (e.g. ring).

No?! Have you read the title of this post?

No, it’s of course not just aria attributes. But it’s definitely not “how easy can I create user CSS”. Accessibility is a term of art, you can’t just expand its meaning to whatever you want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessibility

Except that you learn the class names once and re-use them across all your projects, whereas CSS classes are different for every single project.

That’s not accessibility.

How *some JS UI libraries handle scoped CSS. Vue for example uses data- attributes instead.

How are class names relevant for accessibility?

What? No. If DLSS requires less memory, you can use more memory for other things. This means you can use a less beefy GPU, which is worse for Nvidia.

Less VRAM usage means you can use higher-quality models and textures.

AFAIK the Crowdstrike issue wasn’t a driver update, just virus definitions outside the driver, so your method wouldn’t have helped.

why do you think they have you sign up with a phone number in the first place?

Again, spam & abuse prevention. We’ve been over this.

I’m sorry that not everyone thinks Signal is a god app worthy of worship. its a message app, and its not the only one. it does stuff some people don’t like. including me.

I’m not saying that Signal is a god app worthy of worship, I’m saying it’s detrimental for them to include SMS functionality, since that’s fundamentally insecure. That’s literally why they removed it. Is that so hard to understand?

Spam isn’t a binary issue, where it either exists or doesn’t. It could very well be the case that, without requiring a phone number, there’d be far more spam (since it’d be far easier to automatically create new accounts).

Again, do you have a better suggestion for spam & abuse prevention?

And still, aside from that - it doesn’t really make sense to expect Signal to offer SMS integration just because it requires a phone number for spam prevention, when offering this integration would be detrimental towards the mission of Signal (offering secure messages).

Do you have a better approach to prevent spam in mind? Without a barrier of entry it becomes a serious issue.

What? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn’t make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).

Edit: oh, you’re probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.

It’s arguably a very bad idea for a secure messenger to also provide an SMS interface, since those are basically cleartext

If it’s only in the type checker, can IDEs/editors correctly show the type information of inferred types then?

Yep, and some (e.g. Pycharm) do. They have to be a bit careful with not assuming too much since lots of legacy code is written in fairly terrible ways, so e.g. default parameter values don’t necessarily set the type of their respective parameters, but it’s definitely possible and mostly a choice by the editor/IDE.

Do they call the type checker themselves to retrieve that info?

Depends on the editor! Pycharm is built on a custom engine by Jetbrains, whereas e.g. the Python VS code plugin by Microsoft (Pylance) is based on Microsofts type checker (pyright).

Type inference is a feature of the type checker, not of Python itself. I’m fairly sure the type checker that’s being developed by the Astral team will have proper inference, and I’ve also had good experiences with pyright in the past.

Though it doesn’t come close to e.g. Typescript, which is a shame - Python could really use the advanced dynamic type checking features TS has.

But if both sides are your enemies, they’re both your friends. But if they’re your friends, they aren’t the enemies of your enemies anymore, which would make them your enemies once again. But then they are your friends again. But then

docker-machine doesn’t use emulation, it’s virtualization.

Though naming it by the following year instead of the release year is clearly a marketing move.