• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I don’t honestly believe that AI can save me time as a developer. I’ve tried several AI agents and every single one cost me time. I had to hold its hand while it fumbled around the code base, then fix whatever it eventually broke.

    I’d imagine companies using AI will need to hire more developers to undo all the damage the AI does to their code base.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I was in the same boat about…3mos ago. But recent tooling is kind of making me rethink things. And to be honest I’m kind of surprised. I’m fairly anti-AI.

      Is it perfect? Fuck no. But with the right prompts and gates, I’m genuinely surprised. Yes, I still have to tweak, but we’re talking entire features being 80% stubbed in sub 1 minute. More if I want it to test and iterate.

      My major concern is the people doing this and not reviewing the code and shipping it. Because it definitely needs massaging…ESPECIALLY for security reasons.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    And it’s intentional. Lay off the workers. Implement AI Slop. Slop does sloppy work. Hire back workers as Temps or Contractors. No benefits. Lower pay.

    Like all of Capitalism. It’s a fucking scam. A conjob. A new innovation in fucking over workers. (Ironically the only “innovation” ever directly produced by Capitalism)

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Forward-thinking companies should use AI to transform each developer into a “10x developer,”

    Developer + AI ≠ Developer x 10

    At best, it means 1.25 x Developer, but in most cases, it will mean 0.5 x Developer. Because AI cannot be trusted to generate safe, reliable code.