• Alex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    From the article it sounds like the limitations come for some app types downloaded directly from a browser. I think this doesn’t affect alternate app stores like f-droid where you are effectively delegating approval to their process.

    I have come across the other limitations mentioned with the Home Assistant companion app which I could only get matter registration to work with the version downloaded from the Play store.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s funny because one browser I use is downloaded from the browsers website which I then use to install the update to said browser.

      Google needs a Luigi.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Well, but where do you get F-Droid? Or stuff like ReVanced Manager.

      Or Epic’s stuff. Wasn’t Google just now sued for this shit and nobody understood why Google lost and Apple didn’t because you can easily sideload on Android.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I completely agree. Unless Google is forced to install more than one app store by default, or forced to have multiple app stores downloadable on Play Store, three is no realistic way to install a third party app store on a phone. In both cases, Google’s cooperation is required.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The article says it only applied to apps requesting certain permissions. I agree I’m an ideal world it would be nice to get f-droid directly from the Play store but at least according to the article the ability to install it isn’t being blocked here.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Allowing fdroid from to come from the play store is NOT a solution by any means. Users should have the right to never touch the play store or agree to googles TOS.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Maybe for the Singapore thing. For the play integrity thing, it applies to apps from anywhere except the play store directly. I use Aurora to install apps that say “not compatible with your device” for no reason. But a week or two ago ago, they started blocking access and saying I needed to install from the play store.

      Fortunately I was able to downgrade and they kept working, but I don’t know how long that will last. At some point the server side will change the API.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Fortunately I haven’t had to do this for anything like my bank app or its multifactor code app, but yeah it would be like that. For apps not published on the play store, they continue working.