• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The restrictions on apk access over the past 10 years have already been an annoying pita. Many of the best power user apks have had to gut themselves over their original functionality, all while obtaining root access over your owned devices has become harder or next to impossible.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Let them keep those. I hereby declare that if I don’t own the thing, I ain’t buying it. So no root, no $$$.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Are they talking about the changes that were made that allow a dev to prevent their app from launching if it fails a Play integrity check?

    If so I don’t see that as a big deal since it is up to the dev to use it. OSS devs that want to distribute their app via apk download won’t enable it, and anyone distributing cracked apks will just disable that along with whatever other changes they are making.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 hours ago

    From what I can tell, all of this shit is on Google versions of Android. If you are on AOSP such as lineage or graphene, from what I understand this has no effect whatsoever.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      But this is not the only aspect of Google’s autocratization; Apps who’s developers have enabled the Google Play Integrity APIs will not run on custom roms.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m sorry, but in that case, it wasn’t worth running the app to begin with. You can either find a third-party app that lets you access the same content, such as Newpipe and YouTube, or you can use it from a web browser, such as your bank, and if you can’t do either of those, then just don’t fucking use that service.

        I was willing to totally switch banks because my previous bank required me to use a mobile app and I did not want to do so. If I must go through some annoyance to use something that works properly, I will.

        For me at least, running as much open source as I can possibly do is worth more than the inconvenience caused by not being able to use these shit services.

        • cmt@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I use open source whenever I can, but sometimes that just isn’t an option in the real world. I work in IT at a hospital that REQUIRES Duo. I use GrapheneOS. I was able to get it to work, but it was a horrible experience.

            • cmt@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 minutes ago

              I did honestly think about this, but its honestly more trouble than it’s worth. Carrying around two phones is just kind of am eh experience, plus I’m new, and I don’t wanna be that guy. If I kept having issues with it, that is probably the route I would have ended up taking, but it’s working as expected now. I’m not a FOSS purest or anything either way. I have a librebooted thinkpad, but I also have several proprietary apps on my phone. Its all about usability for me.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        cool, any dev who requires that is acting in bad faith against my privacy and doesn’t deserve my support.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The problem comes when it’s not an app you’re using for the app’s sake, but because it’s the app of some company you have a real-world relationship with. Your bank’s app being the most important one that comes to my mind, considering I’ve already heard about some banks trying to restrict users to only Google’s flavour of Android before this.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            and that’s important why? pick a different bank, or don’t use the app at all.

            I get that some folks think using the app is a requirement. that may be true for some but not all.

            don’t support shitty services and these companies won’t continue to abuse us.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In parallel, Google has rolled out its Play Integrity API, which allows developers to limit app functionality when sideloaded, effectively pushing users to install apps only through the Google Play Store.

    All of this while EU forbids Apple to do the same, what is the idea here? Measuring how EU reacts?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Is it the same though? Google is allowing the developers to choose to prevent sideloading. I thought Apple’s issue was that they prevented side loading completely.

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    In Singapore, lots of boomers are downloading scam apps from facebook lured by promises of discounts and free gifts, handing out accessibility privileges, and they’ll even argue vehemently against loved ones and bank staff when confronted. When it all inevitably blows up, they blame absolutely everyone except themselves, including praising Apple for some reason.

    Being the largest voting block, they managed to get banks responsible for reimbursing their losses and there was even an idea floated of getting everyone to contribute to a shitty scam insurance fund. Many major banking apps are paranoid af and block usage from simple things like usb debugging turned on.

    Absolutely stupidity. And there’s nothing we can do about it when the politicians love them so much.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Usb debugging is sketchy as shit. You should almost never turn that on, and immediately turn it off once you’re finished with whatever it is you’re doing with that on.

      • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        agree completely. But I recently broke my phone screen, the usual Samsung green screen of death, and I wish I had that turned on to copy the data over lol.

  • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    effectively pushing users to install apps only through the Google Play Store

    I wonder what this will mean for Aurora and Fdroid etc.

    • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is my immediate first thought seeing this. This fucking sucks. Part of the whole benefit of something like LineageOS or e (OS?) was being able to use Fdroid to stay away from Google as much as possible. Now this is going to potentially make things weird.

      • mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        doesn’t do anything to f-droid, but probably kills aurora a bit. the developer can prevent their app from being sideloaded. why would one prevent that if they are distributing via f-droid too?

      • Emi@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I hope f-droid has nothing to do with Google play store, thought they are their own store without connection to Google.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Aaaaand now I’m carrying around a laptop again, at least mini pcs are tiny now, maybe a small handheld would do…

        if any of this shit hinders me, I’ll get a dumb phone and the cheapest iphone available for manditory work-based things and say so-long to being a mobile OS user.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I recently started carrying a GPD microPC because of this bullshit.

          It’s like a very bulky phone. Pocketable but kinda chonk. Thumb typing kinda thing.

          But it runs Fedora + gnome with no problems.

          My phone is now just for quick stuff and a way to make a WiFi hotspot.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        That doesnt appear to be true, the restriction seems to be on apps being installed from file managers, web browsers, messaging, etc.

        F-droid and the like are not part of that list.

        This still isn’t good, but it doesnt stop you from having F-droid manage your messaging apps it would seem.

        Edit: If you’re down voting because you think its using the same method as a file manager as the user that replied to me, this is incorrect. This is also an issue going back several versions.

        F-Droid uses a session installer method for 3rd party app stores, it does not use the same method as a file manager.

        For an article about a similar issue brought up by similar restrictions in previous updates, you can refer to this article:

        https://www.androidauthority.com/android-15-restricted-settings-sideloading-3481098/

        You can also refer to this thread in the F-Droid forums which covers this as well, from 2 1/2 years ago:

        https://forum.f-droid.org/t/sideloading-restrictions-or-removal-in-future-how-it-effects-fdroid/21089/10

        Which also includes a merged discussion from the last time this came up 9 months ago.

        F-Droid has been using the session installer method for quite some time.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yikes this really doesn’t look good. Is there any reporting on it from independent journalists (or anyone else who isn’t also advertising their own competing operating system)?

    • chameleon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I haven’t seen proper reporting but the Play Integrity install source thing is accurate. There’s a reasonably good overview straight from the devil himself.

      Lots of things that have very valid reasons on paper that also just happen to give Google a stupid amount of control and will backfire for a somewhat small percentage of people in very bad ways. We’ve been at “you can’t use pretty much any bank unless you agree to either Google or Apple terms” for quite some years now, now we’re giving those same app developers ways to detect if their device has accessibility APIs enabled (useful to protect against bot farms, but also a functional check for “you’re able-bodied”) or is in security support (also a functional check for “not reliant on hand-me-downs”).

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not that I’ve seen and I’d take what Purism say with a grain of salt: they’ve acted like pretty shitty gatekeepers themselves. Nothing they mentioned in the article seems too egregious in truth and they’re exaggerating the scale of it: Play Store app DRM exists already, and the restrictions on browser-downloaded apps they mention can be bypassed (albeit by having to go into settings) and don’t apply to apps installed through other apps stores (F-Droid, etc).

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Nothing they mentioned in the article seems too egregious in truth

        Doesn’t it? To be honest, if the article is telling the truth and not exaggerated, I find this pretty egregious. How you installed an app should be irrelevant, so the idea of an API to say “did this come from the Play Store” is fucking shit. And the ability to block installation of apps that call certain APIs entirely is even worse.

  • Alex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    From the article it sounds like the limitations come for some app types downloaded directly from a browser. I think this doesn’t affect alternate app stores like f-droid where you are effectively delegating approval to their process.

    I have come across the other limitations mentioned with the Home Assistant companion app which I could only get matter registration to work with the version downloaded from the Play store.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, but where do you get F-Droid? Or stuff like ReVanced Manager.

      Or Epic’s stuff. Wasn’t Google just now sued for this shit and nobody understood why Google lost and Apple didn’t because you can easily sideload on Android.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I completely agree. Unless Google is forced to install more than one app store by default, or forced to have multiple app stores downloadable on Play Store, three is no realistic way to install a third party app store on a phone. In both cases, Google’s cooperation is required.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The article says it only applied to apps requesting certain permissions. I agree I’m an ideal world it would be nice to get f-droid directly from the Play store but at least according to the article the ability to install it isn’t being blocked here.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Allowing fdroid from to come from the play store is NOT a solution by any means. Users should have the right to never touch the play store or agree to googles TOS.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Maybe for the Singapore thing. For the play integrity thing, it applies to apps from anywhere except the play store directly. I use Aurora to install apps that say “not compatible with your device” for no reason. But a week or two ago ago, they started blocking access and saying I needed to install from the play store.

      Fortunately I was able to downgrade and they kept working, but I don’t know how long that will last. At some point the server side will change the API.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Fortunately I haven’t had to do this for anything like my bank app or its multifactor code app, but yeah it would be like that. For apps not published on the play store, they continue working.